nyc.general

On 26 Feb 2008 16:38:43 GMT, "John Q. Public" wrote:

>In message
>news:240e0743-8fbb-4884-bc3b-490530432a4d@,
>is alleged to have said:
>
>> On Feb 25, 10:33 pm, "John Q. Public" wrote:
>>> In messagenews:ls07s3599m8o73m0kqeool86kkavhng4i5@, Phil is
>>> alleged
>>
>>> to have said:
>>>
>>> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:17:18 -0500, "MasterChief" <1...@>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >>I check  only non-controlled outlets,
>>> >>The rest is  a waste of time.
>>>
>>> > A non-controlled outlet?  Like youtube?  Or newsgroups?  Where a
>>> > person can u/l whatever he or she likes and not have to worry if
>>> > it's true or not?
>>>
>>> How many news outlets who omit Ron Paul from their campaign coverage
>>> would
>>
>>> you consider "true"?
>>
>> Just because network news doesn't spend much air time on Ron Paul,
>> doesn't mean it's a controlled outlet.
>
>All the networks and major newspapers are CFR. Hitlery, Osama and McInsane
>are CFR. You do the math.

Do the math? Hillary, Obama and McCaine each have delegate votes in
the triple digits. Paul just broke double digits. How's that for
math?

The networks and major newspapers aren't going to spend time and space
talking about a candidate that has no chance of winning. They don't
get ratings by talking about lost causes.


Phil