"Jim"
news:$@...
>
> "Six String Stu"
> news:4c3e8$47bdb0a9$d893ae87$9869@...
>>
>> "faye"
>> news:4a095a02-27ef-49a0-8a5d-80ea6a789e32@...
>>> Thanks for the latest e-mail. Just to clarify, my ex was approved for
>>> ss Disability in Nov., of 2005. He has been receiving app $1500
>>> dollars a mth. We have 3 children I have full custody of our
>>> youngest daughter who was 17 yrs old and a jr in High School at the
>>> time. I was suppose to get the child benefit of app $ a mth to
>>> help with schooling, housing ,medical etc. This is a seperate payment
>>> to go to the parent who has custody, which is myself. My daughter and
>>> I did not know of this until Nov 07. The money has been going know
>>> where. My ex kept this info from me and our child. Very cruel on his
>>> part. We were told we could only go back 12 mths from Nov 07. We
>>> received 8 mths but now have to appeal back to Nov 05. The benefits
>>> stopped June 07 when she graduated from High School. Ant thoughts???
>> Here's a thought. Go after him in civil court for the arrears payments
>> not covered under the 12 month retro payment.
>> Or chalk it up to an education and let life go onward, uninhinderd and no
>> longer a "victem" of an unhornorable ex.
> But Stu; she's assuming that he =knew= and viciously hid this info from
> her. This country boy ain't buyin' it..... How clear was =your= mind when
> you went through all this stuff? I know I was dazed and confused. He
> probably had not got Clue One that his daughter could get money for a
> short time. And this gal that is trashing him online for a few bucks when
> he is disabled is beginning to grate on my nerves, fast.
> Have a good one, and stay warm! :-)
> Jim
>
Granted, there are two sides to every coin.
Yet if she feels strong enough in her conviction to make such an accusation,
then the light of honest investigation could prove the point. Or back fire
:-)