nyc.general

"#1 donkey" wrote in message
news:13djf8maio26u14@ ...
>
> "XTS" wrote in message
> news:46d9bb5e$0$6381$4c368faf@ ...
> >
> > "nickoblake" wrote in message
> > news: @ ...
> >> Maybe, if he hadn't criticized Clinton, he'd have more support.
> >>
> >> Is that possible, or are we a hopelessly immature society.
> >>
> >> My premise is, if Senator Craig wants to keep his sexual preferences
> >> in the closet, he should have that right, even if he is a public
> >> figure.
> >>
> >> Privacy is freedom too:
> >>
> >> /president
> >>
> >
> > It's really not about anything but a choice he made about trying to get
> > some
> > man sex in a public place. His choice, his consequences. Thats life.
> > Republicans seem to think they are exempt from the consequences everyone
> > else has to pay, live with and suffer through. He forfieted his privacy
> > on
> > his own...too bad for him.
> >
> >
>
> Do you think that his adopted kids will distance themselves from Larry?
> Lots of family fallout from this one. Just watch.
>
>

If he's an arrogant wise ass like some of the inerviews I seen on TV
recently from him, I would say yes. Who would want to hang out with such an
arrogant prick, especially when the self rightious asshole has been exposed
for living a double life. That condecending low down interview he did with
Chris Matthews about Bill Clinton was terrible as it was, and now that we
know what he was up to at the time, my God, who would want to be in the same
room with an asshole like that? He may have seperated himself from more
than the US Senate. It's that underlying base dishonesty of the
republicans, they just will not ever be honest.