nyc.general

XTS wrote:
> "SMITH29" wrote in message
> news:13djl83fbvssi01@ ...
>> XTS wrote:
>>> "nickoblake" wrote in message
>>> news: @ ...
>>>> Maybe, if he hadn't criticized Clinton, he'd have more support.
>>>>
>>>> Is that possible, or are we a hopelessly immature society.
>>>>
>>>> My premise is, if Senator Craig wants to keep his sexual preferences
>>>> in the closet, he should have that right, even if he is a public
>>>> figure.
>>>>
>>>> Privacy is freedom too:
>>>>
>>>> /president
>>>>
>>> It's really not about anything but a choice he made about trying to get
> some
>>> man sex in a public place. His choice, his consequences. Thats life.
>>> Republicans seem to think they are exempt from the consequences everyone
>>> else has to pay, live with and suffer through. He forfieted his privacy
> on
>>> his own...too bad for him.
>>>
>>>
>> xxxx
>> His first mistake was joining the Republican Party.
>> He clearly is a Democrat.
>
> Your mistake was writing such stupid post about a man who has been a right
> wing conservative for decades numbnuts.
xxxx
Numbnuts he was because for some reason he was probably forced into that
way of life and he didn't belong there.
Being conservative isn't a political choice. Conservatism is a moral way
of life that's genetic.
The caveman was a liberal type while the settler/farmer was the grounds
for the conservative.


29
>
>