nyc.general

"SMITH29" wrote in message
news:13djsircjb06pb3@ ...
> XTS wrote:
>> "SMITH29" wrote in message
>> news:13djl83fbvssi01@ ...
>>> XTS wrote:
>>>> "nickoblake" wrote in message
>>>> news: @ ...
>>>>> Maybe, if he hadn't criticized Clinton, he'd have more support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that possible, or are we a hopelessly immature society.
>>>>>
>>>>> My premise is, if Senator Craig wants to keep his sexual preferences
>>>>> in the closet, he should have that right, even if he is a public
>>>>> figure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Privacy is freedom too:
>>>>>
>>>>> /president
>>>>>
>>>> It's really not about anything but a choice he made about trying to get
>> some
>>>> man sex in a public place. His choice, his consequences. Thats life.
>>>> Republicans seem to think they are exempt from the consequences
>>>> everyone
>>>> else has to pay, live with and suffer through. He forfieted his
>>>> privacy
>> on
>>>> his own...too bad for him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> xxxx
>>> His first mistake was joining the Republican Party.
>>> He clearly is a Democrat.
>>
>> Your mistake was writing such stupid post about a man who has been a
>> right
>> wing conservative for decades numbnuts.
> xxxx
> Numbnuts he was because for some reason he was probably forced into that
> way of life and he didn't belong there.
> Being conservative isn't a political choice. Conservatism is a moral way
> of life that's genetic.

Seems there's a lot of cocksuckers in the Republican party. Must be genetic
to want to suck cock and then vote conservatively.


> The caveman was a liberal type while the settler/farmer was the grounds
> for the conservative.
>
>
> 29
>>