uk.people.disability

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:56:48 -0700, Tony
wrote:

>On Sep 5, 6:55 pm, ...@ wrote:
>>
>> Cynic is being by attacked an acknowledged loony with no good reason for the abuse.
>
>hey creep, if you consider *Cynic* a decent guy, just stop and think
>with that small pea brain of yours, Cynic or dave Mould was sent to
>prison for sex crimes, he was director of a company a partner in
>several small enterprises and not one of his partners came to court to
>defend him, not one of his fellow directors gave him any help what so
>ever, all found a reason to move on pretty damned fast.
>
>Now half wit, read about what the local papers published about him
>below, take careful note of the names and crimes he did and then re
>read this thread and NB how many times Cynic or Dave Mould lies,
>before you go off with your allegation af an acknowled loony, Just
>compare and contrast the lies in this thread and ask your self would
>you be guided by an obvious and clear cut liar as Dave Mould in any
>thing
>
> /2000/10/24/company_director_jailed_for_kiddie/

To restore a little balance, here's his successful appeal against the
sentence: /pca_1978/reference/

And here's a criticism of how the original case was conducted:
/reports/

--
Cub Reporter