uk.people.disability

judith wrote in news:bd20e31i2thlti3il18cfgt10nurp63s2c@
:

>> /reports/
>
>
> Excellent - links - the first time I have seen these.

Whilst I am *not* going to get involved in the wider debate you ought to
know before you go eulogising that, Jim Bates (Mr "Computer
Investigations" himself) has been proven to be (a) dishonest in that he has
repeatedly lied to courts, police and clients up and down the country about
his qualifications, (b) unqualified and (c) incapable of handling evidence
in a forensicly robust manner.

As for the rest, well my stance on child pornography and those who use it
is reasonably well known, certainly well enough for me not to have to
repeat it here however I find all this sniping at regular posters to be out
and out bollocks and I’d much rather it didn’t occur. Not that anyone will
take the blindest bit of notice ...

--
Regards or otherwise,

Periander