uk.people.disability

On 2 Oct, 15:11, judith wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:43:09 -0700, "Theo_Deli...@ "
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
> >On 2 Oct, 12:50, judith wrote:
> >> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:26:04 -0700, "Theo_Deli...@ "
>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On 2 Oct, 10:58, "The Todal" wrote:
> >> >> wrote in message
> >> >>news: @ ...
> >> >> > On 2 Oct, 09:18, "The Todal" wrote:
> >> >> >> wrote in message
> >> >> >>news:vhm3g39vtf39a4fradshhmp8s9jhd5b3hl@ ...
>
> >> >> >> > Is there a litigants in person society or support in London England?
>
> >> >> >> If there is, you should distrust it.
>
> >> >> >> Most people who are litigants in person have maybe two or three court
> >> >> >> cases
> >> >> >> in their entire lives, and therefore have no need to form a society.
> >> >> >> Anyone
> >> >> >> who habitually sues other people as a litigant in person, is probably
> >> >> >> mentally unbalanced.
>
> >> >> > Really, Derek!
>
> >> >> > Everyone needs a hobby, even Peter Turtill!
>
> >> >> Actually, I suppose someone should conduct a survey to find out how many
> >> >> people have sued or been personally sued, in the County Court.
>
> >> >> I think I'm currently on my third case, hence my rash assumption "two or
> >> >> three court cases".
>
> >> >Either you are or you are not on your third case, unless you are
> >> >waiting for the other party to respond.
>
> >> >Is trade in the market so bad these days that you can't afford a
> >> >lawyer?
>
> >> >> I suppose it is possible that you could have quite a
> >> >> few more and still be sane.
>
> >> >Yes, that may be possible; it might even be _possible_ that smicker is
> >> >not the litigious loony he is otherwise reckoned to be.
>
> >> I believe that incredulity will not stretch that far.
>
> >Whilst I find it barely credible that someone should use a word like
> >"incredulity" without apparently having any idea what it means.
>
> >Have a free clue: /incredulity
>
> I was wanting to imply that there may be disbelief that smicker is
> not a litigious loony but I could not stretch this disbelief that far.
> Please can you explain where I have gone wrong.

No. You only get one free clue per diem.

If you have not worked it out by tomorrow, I may tell you then.

--
x If you have been, are you still constipated?
/|\