now now lets not be so mean... but funny LOL
tho.
"Gi
Group: Date: Wed, Sep 19, 2007, 2:44pm
(CDT+5) From: jim@ (Jim)
"Gina May"
news:25627-46F0F70D-185@storefull-3136.bay. ... Thankyou jack
I'll get this over to this lawyer see what he says later if he calls
me.. I am not calling him for a few days.. he said he will be out of the
office anyhow.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Maybe he'll get hit by a bus.
HUGS
From "Gi
Group: Date: Tue, Sep 18, 2007, 7:23pm
(CDT+5) From: nospam@ (Jack)
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:29:12 -0500, Psalm56@ (Gina May) wrote:
Thankyou jack
I appreciate your help. &
I see what you are saying here. about the credits.. I have relayed that
on to this nutty lawyer.
I've tried to tell him.. that this so called new illness as he claims I
have is not a new illness but in fact the docs have just now put a name
on my illness but he dont see it that way.. hes the lawyer but im the
client.. he needs to realize this and not just say well I dont know what
Iam talking about in fact I do know what iam saying. Gina,
Show this to your atty.
A new initial application will take 100 days to process. To get your
case before the Appeals Council might take a year. If your work credits
ran out before the ALJ's decision, the new application won't do you any
good. You'll have to continue to the Appeals Council or else your case
will be dismissed as res adjudicata. If your work credits ran out after
the ALJ's decision, it's OK to file a new application but make sure that
your alleged onset in your new application is not after the work credits
ran out. If your work credits are still running, no problem.